Additional Menu
Focus and Scope
Peer Review Process
Open Access Policy
Publication Ethics
Copyright & License
Article Readiness Level Testing
Article Processing Charges
Author Guidelines
Article Template
Open Access Policy
Reviewer Board
Editorial Board
Article Readiness Level Testing
Before you submit your manuscript, it is highly recommended that you pre-evaluate it using Article Readiness Level Testing (ARLT), an instrument we developed to help you get adequate peer-review process time.
(Level 1)
|
(level 2)
|
(level 3)
|
|
| Title: Straightforward, informative, and represents the contents of the article. | |||
|
Abstract: Concise but at least contain the problem, purpose, method, essential findings, and implications of the research.
|
|||
|
Keywords: Searchable by the search engine, truly represents the research intention. Don’t use phrases, only words. 5 to 6 keyword is recommended.
|
|||
|
Introduction: Directing the reader about the importance of the research. Presenting significant problems, a clear state of the art, gap analysis, and novel concepts to fill the gaps. End it with the purpose of research.
|
|||
| Literature Review: The literature review submitted has answered all the theoretical problem formulations and has been explained briefly and clearly. | 5 | 2 | 1 |
|
Method: Clear and replicable. Reveals how research objectives are achieved with the appropriate tools, procedures, and stages.
|
|||
|
Results: Presenting experimental or survey data or any other data depends on the research type. The results are generally presented in clear and readable tables and figures.
|
|||
|
Discussion: Meaningful. A good discussion is written as a dialogue that reveals the progress of the research in comparison to previous research.
|
|||
|
Conclusion: Contains a summary of research results (the most critical research finding) related to the objectives written in the introduction.
|
|||
|
References: Accountable, about 80% of the literature is from primary sources (reputable journals) and up to date (last 10 years). Use reference management tools.
|
|||
Possibility Matrix
| Probability | |
81-100
|
Most likely to be published with little discussion with the Editor/Reviewer
|
65-80
|
Possible minor revision (if there are no mistakes in principle)
|
50-64
|
Possible major revision
|
25-49
|
Most likely to be rejected in the first stage
|
Disclaimer: The Article Readiness Level Testing (ARLT) above is used by authors as a “tool” to optimize the peer-reviewing process. The decision to accept or reject an article for publication in PREVENIRE: Journal of Multidisciplinary Science is the authority of the Editor based on recommendations from reviewers.


