Profile Of Critical Thinking Tendency Students Of The Chemistry And Natural Sciences Education Study Program Institut Studi Islam Sunan Doe
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58330/prevenire.v1i2.13Keywords:
Critical Thinking, Students, CCDTIAbstract
The tendency to think critically is one of the essential competencies to be mapped from an early age, this student's competence must be analyzed for its development and must constantly be developed because students very much need it to be able to compete in the 21st century later. This study aims to look at the profile of the level of critical thinking tendencies of students of science study programs, namely Chemistry Education and Natural Science at the Institut Studi Islam Sunan Doe. This research was conducted using descriptive and quantitative approaches to see the profile of students' critical thinking tendencies at the Institut Studi Islam Sunan Doe. The research subjects were students of the third semester of the Chemistry and Science Tadris study programs. Data were collected based on the Critical Thinking Tendency test results using a questionnaire adapted from the CCDTI (California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory). The results of this study indicate that 1) The profile of critical thinking tendencies in chemistry and natural science education students has an average of above 50% in the positive category, which generally means quite good. 2) The indicator of the highest critical thinking tendency in chemistry education students is the Inquisitiveness indicator (curiosity). 3) The indicator of the highest critical thinking tendency for Tadris IPA students is the Truth-seeking indicator.
Downloads
References
Chaffee, J. (2014). Thinking critically. Cengage Learning.
Dökmecioğlu, B., Tas, Y., & Yerdelen, S. (2020). Predicting students’ critical thinking dispositions in science through their perceptions of constructivist learning environments and metacognitive self-regulation strategies: A mediation analysis. Educational Studies, 1–18.
Dombrowski, S. C., J. McGill, R., Farmer, R. L., Kranzler, J. H., & Canivez, G. L. (2021). Beyond the rhetoric of evidence-based assessment: A framework for critical thinking in clinical practice. School Psychology Review, 1–14.
Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment, 2007(1), 1–23.
Fikriyati, A., Agustini, R., & Suyatno, S. (2022). Pre-service Science Teachers’ Critical Thinking Dispositions and Critical Thinking Skills. Eighth Southeast Asia Design Research (SEA-DR) & the Second Science, Technology, Education, Arts, Culture, and Humanity (STEACH) International Conference (SEADR-STEACH 2021), 176–181.
Gunawardena, M., & Wilson, K. (2021). Scaffolding students’ critical thinking: A process not an end game. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, 100848.
Lestari, N., Hartono, Y., & Purwoko, P. (2016). Pengaruh pendekatan open-ended terhadap penalaran matematika siswa sekolah menengah pertama palembang. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Sriwijaya, 10(1), 81–95.
Marabini, A. (2022). Ethics, Education, and Reasoning. In Critical Thinking and Epistemic Injustice (pp. 37–104). Springer.
Paul, R. W. (2018). Critical thinking and the critical person. Thinking: The Second International Conference, 373–403.
Ramadhan, S., Sukma, E., & Indriyani, V. (2019). Environmental education and disaster mitigation through language learning. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 314(1), 012054.
Riyanto, R., Amin, M., Suwono, H., & Lestari, U. (2020). The new face of digital books in genetic learning: A preliminary development study for students’ critical thinking. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (Online), 15(10), 175.
Spector, J. M., & Ma, S. (2019). Inquiry and critical thinking skills for the next generation: From artificial intelligence back to human intelligence. Smart Learning Environments, 6(1), 1–11.
Straková, Z., & Cimermanová, I. (2018). Critical thinking development—A necessary step in higher education transformation towards sustainability. Sustainability, 10(10), 3366.
Sudarmo, M. S. N. (2021). The Identification of Online Strategy Learning Results While Students Learn from Home During the Disruption of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government| Vol, 27(2), 1951.
Wahyuni, S., Sanjaya, I. G. M., Erman, E., & Jatmiko, B. (2019). Edmodo-based blended learning model as an alternative of science learning to motivate and improve junior high school students’ scientific critical thinking skills. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (Online), 14(7), 98.
Wiradinata, R., Rosita, C. D., & Amalia, S. (2021). How is the mathematical critical thinking disposition of vocational school students in online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic? Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1918(4), 042096.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 PREVENIRE: Journal of Multidisciplinary Science
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
